New Hampshire 2022 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HB1469

Introduced
12/1/21  
Refer
12/1/21  
Report Pass
2/9/22  
Report DNP
2/9/22  
Refer
3/8/22  
Engrossed
4/5/22  
Refer
4/5/22  
Report Pass
4/19/22  
Enrolled
6/9/22  
Chaptered
6/22/22  

Caption

Establishing a committee to study the need for anti-discrimination legislation in the New Hampshire financial services industry.

Impact

If enacted, HB 1469 could significantly impact how financial institutions operate within New Hampshire by potentially requiring them to adhere to new anti-discrimination standards. This may lead to greater accountability among banks and credit unions regarding their customer interactions. The bill also calls for a review of whether the New Hampshire banking department has adequate resources to handle complaints and enforce any new regulations that could result from the committee's findings.

Summary

House Bill 1469, as amended, establishes a committee to study the potential need for anti-discrimination legislation specific to the New Hampshire financial services industry. This bill stems from concerns about discrimination practices that financial institutions may employ regarding customers based on their legally protected expressions, such as political viewpoints or social media activities. The committee's function is to evaluate these practices and report back on whether new legislation is necessary to address potential discrimination.

Sentiment

General sentiments surrounding HB 1469 appear to be cautious, with supporters acknowledging the need for a review of discrimination practices in financial services, while some may express concerns about the implications of additional regulations. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step to protect consumers' rights, while opponents may worry about increased governmental oversight and potential burdens on financial institutions. The discussion thus reflects a balance between consumer protection and the operational freedom of businesses.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns about the definition of discrimination within financial services and the potential ramifications of enforcing such legislation. Critics worry that vague definitions could lead to misunderstandings or overly broad enforcement that may unfairly affect institutions. Additionally, the financial implications of any resultant legislation, including the anticipated workload on the banking department and the handling of consumer complaints, remain uncertain and are points of debate among legislators and stakeholders.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NH SB411

Establishing a committee to study emergency mental health services for persons 21 years of age and younger in New Hampshire.

NH SB152

Relative to New Hampshire workforce training programs.

NH SB573

Establishing a committee to study consent and confidentiality laws applicable to adolescent and young adult health care in New Hampshire.

NH HB1600

Relative to participation in net energy metering.

NH HB1547

Relative to per fluorinated chemical remediation in soil and procedures for certain hazardous waste generators.

NH SB176

Relative to insurance coverage for pelvic floor therapy.

NH SB293

Establishing a committee to clarify the intent of RSA 644:9 relative to violation of privacy.

NH SB549

Relative to procedures for inspection and transfer of dams and establishing a committee to study alternatives for the funding, operation, maintenance, and repair of state-owned dams.