Relative to funds credited to the harbor dredging and pier maintenance fund and making appropriations for the dredging of Rye harbor and Seabrook/Hampton harbor.
Impact
If enacted, the bill would have a significant financial impact, with appropriations amounting to $243,750 for the fiscal year end June 30, 2023, to be split among the municipalities adjacent to the Seabrook/Hampton harbor. Additionally, it allocates $637,500 for the subsequent fiscal year specifically aimed at the dredging of Rye harbor. This funding aims to bolster local efforts and improve infrastructure related to waterway management. However, it should be noted that the municipalities do not have jurisdiction over dredging decisions, as this falls under the purview of the state's Division of Ports and Harbors and the federal government, leading to some complexities regarding the usage of these funds.
Summary
House Bill 1572-FN-A aims to enhance the financial resources available for the maintenance and dredging of key harbors in New Hampshire, specifically the Rye harbor and the Seabrook/Hampton harbor. The bill allows for additional funds to be credited to the harbor dredging and pier maintenance fund through various sources such as gifts, grants, donations, and development fees. This reallocation of resources is intended to support local economies and ensure the safety and accessibility of these vital waterways for commerce and recreation. Furthermore, the bill proposes specific appropriations for dredging activities over the next two fiscal years.
Sentiment
The general sentiment around HB 1572 is one of support, particularly among local governments that could benefit from improved harbor conditions and increased funding for maintenance. The discussion surrounding the bill acknowledges the strategic importance of well-maintained harbors to both economic activities and environmental stewardship. Nevertheless, there are concerns regarding the adequacy of local control over how these funds are expended, as decision-making may primarily rest with state and federal authorities, potentially limiting the input of local communities.
Contention
Notable points of contention involve the clarity and effectiveness of spending these funds, as the bill does not specify how municipalities will implement the dredging projects or the timeline for when the funds will be utilized. Critics may argue that without a solid plan or proper oversight, the intended benefits could be diluted. Moreover, since municipalities are not directly responsible for dredging, there is uncertainty regarding the practical implications of this funding and whether it will truly meet the needs of the communities surrounding the affected harbors.
To provide appropriations from the General Fund for the expenses of the Executive, Legislative and Judicial Departments of the Commonwealth, the public debt and the public schools for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills incurred and remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; to provide appropriations from special funds and accounts to the Executive and Judicial Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; to provide for the appropriation of Federal funds to the Executive and Judicial Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, and for the payment of bills remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023; and to provide for the additional appropriation of Federal and State funds to the Executive and Legislative Departments for the fiscal year July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2023, and for the payment of bills incurred and remaining unpaid at the close of the fiscal year ending June 30, 2022.