If passed, HB 355 would significantly impact the Revenue Administration’s regulations regarding electronic gaming and lottery activities. By allowing Keno to be offered in specific jurisdictions, the bill may create new revenue streams for both local governments and the state, enhancing funding for educational and public programs funded through lottery revenues. The law's provisions will establish comprehensive guidelines for the operational aspects of Keno sales, potentially streamlining processes for retailers who choose to provide this gaming option.
Summary
House Bill 355 seeks to amend existing state laws to allow licensed lottery retailers in jurisdictions that have voted in favor of Keno to operate Keno games. The bill specifies the regulatory framework under which these retailers can sell Keno tickets and display the games on active screens. This proposed legislation aims to expand gaming options in New Hampshire, allowing municipalities the authority to decide whether to permit Keno within their localities, thus emphasizing local governance in matters pertaining to gaming.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 355 appears to be generally positive among its sponsors and supporters, who argue that it will provide a beneficial local option for municipalities wishing to diversify their entertainment and revenue sources. However, there may also be concerns from certain groups regarding the implications of expanding gambling and the potential social impacts that could arise from increased gaming options in communities.
Contention
Notable points of contention may arise around the potential risks associated with increased gambling options, including concerns regarding problem gambling, the adequacy of support and oversight for new gaming activities, and the balance between local control and state oversight. While proponents tout the benefits of increased revenue and local choice, opponents may argue for caution in expanding gambling in any form, especially without comprehensive measures to address the associated social risk factors.
Creating local options for games of chance, authorizing keno throughout the state, and changing charitable gaming license fees and reporting requirements.
Relative to the acquisition of agricultural land development rights and relative to advanced deposit account wagering and relative to the use of game cameras.