Relative to death benefits of first responders who die from suicide.
If passed, this bill will change the eligibility criteria for death benefits under the state law, specifically amending RSA 21-I:29-a. It will authorize the payment of $100,000 to the families of first responders who die by suicide, making it a work-related death. The fiscal impact is expected to lead to an indeterminable increase in state expenditures, forecasting approximately $500,000 in payments each fiscal year due to an estimated five suicides per year among this group. Additionally, this bill expresses a commitment to supporting the mental health needs of first responders.
House Bill 91-FN proposes to amend existing state law to include suicide as a cause for death considered 'killed in the line of duty' for first responders such as police officers, firefighters, and emergency medical technicians. This significant change is intended to extend death benefits to the families of first responders who die by suicide, recognizing the occupational hazards associated with their roles that may contribute to mental health issues leading to such tragedies. By defining suicide in this context, the bill aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the risks faced by first responders.
The sentiment surrounding HB 91 is generally positive, with strong support from advocates who emphasize the importance of mental health services and the welfare of first responders. The bill has garnered attention for addressing the often-overlooked issue of suicide in emergency response professions. However, there may be challenges related to the fiscal implications and the perceived adequacy of mental health support systems for these individuals, which could prompt varied opinions within the legislative discussion.
While there is overall support for the intent behind HB 91, the key contention lies in the financial ramifications of extending these benefits, given the potential increase in state spending. Critics may question whether the state is equipped to handle the additional expenditures, and whether this bill sufficiently addresses broader mental health support for first responders beyond financial compensation. Thus, while the initiative aims to provide a safety net for families, the sustainability of funding remains a critical discussion point.