Opposing all federal and state efforts to establish a carbon tax on fuels for electricity and transportation.
Impact
The passage of HR17 would express the state of New Hampshire's official stance against any legislation that attempts to impose a carbon tax. This resolution aims to align state policy with the idea that the primary function of the tax code should be to fund necessary government operations rather than influence consumer choices or behaviors regarding energy consumption. It could signal to federal lawmakers the state's lack of support for a carbon tax, potentially affecting economic policies and initiatives related to clean energy and climate change mitigation.
Summary
House Resolution 17 (HR17) is a resolution that opposes any federal or state initiatives aimed at establishing a carbon tax on fuels used for electricity and transportation. The resolution emphasizes the importance of affordable and abundant electricity as crucial for modern life and America's economic competitiveness. It argues that a carbon tax would lead to drastic and immediate increases in transportation costs and electricity prices, thus diminishing affordability for many citizens. Proponents assert that such a tax would unfairly burden the economy without reducing global emissions, particularly from major emitters like China and India.
Sentiment
Sentiment surrounding HR17 has been largely supportive among constituents who prioritize maintaining low energy costs and safeguarding the economic competitiveness of U.S. industries. Supporters of the resolution believe that imposing a carbon tax might lead to negative repercussions on the economy, while opponents might argue that it is a necessary step toward addressing climate issues. This division points to broader national debates about energy policy, environmental responsibility, and economic priorities.
Contention
A notable point of contention with HR17 is its stance against broader environmental initiatives aimed at reducing carbon emissions. Critics may view the resolution as an impediment to necessary environmental action, arguing that it dismisses the urgency of addressing climate change. By opposing all forms of carbon taxation, HR17 could complicate future discussions regarding sustainable practices and climate policies, thereby highlighting the tension between economic priorities and environmental stewardship.
"New Jersey Clean Energy Act of 2024"; establishes 100 percent clean electricity standard and directs BPU to establish clean electricity certificate program.