Relative to the rate of the business enterprise tax.
Impact
The fiscal impact of this reduction is indeterminable according to the Department of Revenue Administration, as it cannot predict future revenue outcomes from the BET. However, the proposed changes are projected to result in a decrease in state revenue, particularly impacting the Education Trust Fund, which receives a significant portion of the BET revenue. The estimates suggest that the state revenue will decrease by approximately $6.2 million in FY 2024, escalating to nearly $28.3 million by FY 2026 when compared to current law.
Summary
House Bill 15 (HB15) proposes to reduce the Business Enterprise Tax (BET) rate from 0.55% to 0.50% for taxable periods ending on or after December 31, 2024. The intention behind this adjustment is to provide relief to businesses by lowering their tax burdens, thereby potentially stimulating economic growth. The act is set to take effect on July 1, 2023, demonstrating a proactive approach to tax reform aimed at supporting the business community in New Hampshire.
Sentiment
Support for the bill generally comes from business advocates who perceive it as a positive development for economic conditions in the state. They argue that a lower tax rate fosters a more conducive environment for local businesses to thrive. Conversely, critics, particularly within educational advocacy circles, express concern that the revenue loss to the Education Trust Fund from the reduced tax rate could hinder funding for schools and educational programs, which may lead to a competitive disadvantage for New Hampshire's educational system.
Contention
A notable point of contention surrounding HB15 revolves around its potential long-term impacts on educational funding. Proponents of the bill emphasize economic growth and its benefits for business, while opponents are alarmed by the prospect of reduced financial support for education. The debate reflects a broader conversation about the balance between fostering a favorable business environment and ensuring sufficient funding for vital public services, highlighting the ongoing challenges in state fiscal policy.
Relative to the rate of the business profits tax, and relative to payment by the state to political subdivisions of an amount equal to a portion of retirement system contributions of political subdivision employers.