Relative to billing for ambulance services.
This legislation is expected to realign the economic dynamics between ambulance service providers and health insurers, imposing a requirement for payments to reflect a 'commercially reasonable value' of the services rendered. This could have significant implications for both the cost structure and financial stability of ambulance services, particularly in rural areas where operating costs can be high. The bill's provisions also require the Insurance Commissioner to adjudicate disputes over service fees, further embedding state mechanisms into billing operations for ambulance services.
House Bill 373 (HB373) aims to reform the process by which ambulance services bill patients and receive payments from insurers in New Hampshire. The bill prohibits 'balance billing' for ambulance services under the managed care framework, meaning that patients with commercial insurance will not be held liable for any fees beyond their copayments, deductibles, or coinsurance if the service is covered by their insurance. The bill mandates that insurers directly reimburse ambulance providers, enhancing consumer protections for those reliant on emergency medical services.
The sentiment around HB373 is predominantly supportive from consumer advocacy groups, emphasizing the necessity for legislation that protects patients from unexpected billing practices that can lead to severe financial strain. Conversely, the bill has drawn some skepticism from insurance companies and possibly fiscal conservatives who may view the mandated reimbursement structures as potential burdens on the insurance market. This divide illustrates a tension between consumer protection and the financial mechanics of healthcare provision.
Notably, there are some points of contention surrounding HB373, particularly concerning how it defines 'commercially reasonable value' and whether this will adequately protect the viability of ambulance services as businesses. Critics question the effectiveness of the mediation and adjudication processes proposed under the bill, which may put additional strain on administrative resources. Local municipalities, which often supplement ambulance services through funding, have expressed concerns over potential increases in expenses while adapting to the new billing model.