New Hampshire 2023 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HB74

Introduced
12/23/22  
Refer
12/23/22  
Refer
1/9/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Report DNP
3/27/23  
Report Pass
3/27/23  
Engrossed
4/11/23  
Refer
4/11/23  

Caption

Relative to an employee's unused earned time.

Impact

The implications of HB74 are significant for labor practices in New Hampshire. The law is expected to enforce a more standardized approach among employers regarding paid leave, thereby elevating employee rights and ensuring fair compensation for accrued time off. The fiscal impact is projected to reach up to $4.5 million for state expenditures as it might create additional liabilities for employers who currently do not compensate for unused earned time. Moreover, local governments could face indeterminable increases in expenses related to compliance with this mandate.

Summary

House Bill 74 aims to legislate the treatment of unused earned time by requiring employers with 15 or more employees to compensate employees for their unused earned time upon termination. The bill establishes that 'earned time' which encompasses vacation and paid time off shall be considered wages due. This means that employees must be informed of accrued time policies and must receive written accounting of their accruals. In cases of termination without cause, employees will be entitled to payment for their unused earned time within the next regular pay period.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding HB74 have shown a generally positive sentiment among employee advocates who see the bill as a necessary measure to enhance workers' rights and protections. Conversely, it raised some concerns among certain employer groups, fearing that the financial implications of the bill could increase operational costs. Overall, the bill appears to enjoy the support of many legislators who prioritize employee compensation and welfare.

Contention

Notable points of contention include how the bill's implementation could differ across various sectors and the potential financial burden it may impose on small businesses. Critics of the bill worry that requiring payment for unused time might lead to decreased hiring or fewer hours worked, particularly in industries with traditionally lower profit margins. Meanwhile, supporters argue that it serves to justify and affirm the value of employees' time and contributions in the workplace.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NH HB1514

Relative to an employee's unused earned time.

NH HB1178

Relative to an employee's unused earned time.

NH HB378

Relative to an employee's unused earned time.

NH SB558

Relative to insurance coverage for infertility treatments, protection from discrimination during IVF treatments, parental leave, and adoption.

NH HB1653

Relative to determination of earnable compensation for certain group II retirement system members.

NH HB1213

Relative to legal holidays.

NH HB1231

Relative to failure to make payment of compensation.

NH SB347

Relative to the use of protected health information by employers.

NH SB177

Relative to requiring New Hampshire employers with over 25 employees use the E-Verify system.

NH SB516

Relative to prohibiting collective bargaining agreements that require employees to join a labor union.

Similar Bills

NH HB524

Relative to regional greenhouse gas initiative funds.

NH HB418

Relative to eliminating the rebates distributed by the energy efficiency fund.

NH SB68

Relative to municipal host for purposes of limited electrical energy producers.

NH SB56

Relative to payments for restoration of certain jurisdictional resource losses.

NH HB1601

Relative to funding of the NHsaves program

NH HB233

Relative to useful thermal energy under the renewable portfolio standards.

NH HB114

Removing fees and charges for governmental records under the right-to-know law and reinstating potential liability for disclosure of information exempt from disclosure.

NH HB1170

Requiring public benefit and community impact assessments from the department of environmental services.