Modifying the absentee voter registration process, absentee ballot application, and absentee ballot voting process.
The proposed changes to SB220 could have a significant impact on state laws regarding voting. By allowing no-excuse absentee voting, the bill is expected to increase voter participation, particularly among those who may struggle to vote in person due to disability, employment, or other obligations. It is also anticipated to modernize and make the voting process more efficient, particularly by allowing election officials to start processing absentee ballots ahead of election day, thus potentially expediting results.
Senate Bill 220 (SB220) aims to modify the absentee voter registration process, absentee ballot application, and absentee voting procedures in New Hampshire. The bill seeks to remove the requirement for voters to provide an excuse for absentee voting, thereby allowing any registered voter to request an absentee ballot without justification. Additionally, it introduces provisions for partial processing of absentee ballots before election day, which is intended to streamline the voting experience and reduce delays in ballot counting after polls close.
The sentiment surrounding SB220 appears to be generally supportive among proponents who see the legislation as a necessary reform to enhance voter accessibility and participation. However, there are concerns among some legislators who fear that allowing no-excuse absentee voting might open the door to potential voter fraud, although these fears are contested by many election experts. The legislative debate hints at a broader discussion about balancing election integrity with increased access to voting.
Notable points of contention in the discussions around SB220 include apprehensions about securing election integrity in the face of expanded absentee voting rights. Critics argue that the ease of obtaining an absentee ballot could lead to increased opportunities for fraud, though proponents counter that robust identification measures and safeguards in the voting process will mitigate such risks. Additionally, there are concerns about the costs associated with training election officials on the new procedures and the overall fiscal impact on local governments, which could increase as they adapt to these changes.