Relative to parental access to a minor child's medical records.
Votes
The voting history for SB253 indicates a closely contested stance among lawmakers, with a vote of 13 in favor and 10 against the bill during its consideration on March 23, 2023. The narrow margin highlights the division on the issues surrounding parental rights, child protection laws, and medical privacy in contemporary healthcare settings.
Impact
The bill introduces conditions under which parental access to medical records may be denied. Access is not permitted if it involves medical treatments that minors can consent to without parental approval, or if there are existing protective orders that apply to the parent concerning the child. Additionally, if a healthcare provider determines that disclosure could lead to abuse or neglect, they have the authority to deny access. These stipulations aim to balance parental rights with the protection of children's wellbeing, responding to potential risks.
Summary
SB253 is a legislative proposal that focuses on the access of parents and legal guardians to the medical records of their minor children. The intention behind this bill is to recognize and affirm the responsibility of parents to provide and coordinate medical care for their children. It establishes that parents are entitled to full access to their minor children's medical records, supporting the argument that this access is fundamental for informed healthcare decisions. However, this access comes with specific restrictions outlined within the bill to protect the welfare of the child, especially in sensitive situations.
Contention
Notably, SB253 has generated debate about the balance between parental access to information and the safeguarding of minors' rights and safety. Supporters argue that granting parents full access to their children's medical records is vital for ensuring that they can make informed healthcare decisions, while opponents raise concerns about the implications for privacy, especially in cases where minors seek sensitive health services. The discussion reflects broader societal concerns about the role of parents versus the rights and autonomy of minors in medical contexts. Emotional and ethical considerations come into play regarding how and when parents should be informed about their children's medical care.
Relative to parental access to a minor child's medical records, relative to refusal of consent to testing to determine alcohol concentration and penalties for aggravated driving while intoxicated, defining pre-sequestration timber tax revenue, establishing a moratorium on carbon sequestration and establishing a commission to study the effects of carbon sequestration in New Hampshire forests upon state and local tax revenue, effective forest management, and the health of New Hampshires logging industry.