Relative to permits for the siting of new landfills.
Impact
The introduction of HB 1132 is poised to significantly impact state law regarding landfill proposals. By enforcing restrictions on permitting greenfield sites, the bill encourages a shift towards utilizing brownfields, which are previously developed lands that may be contaminated. This shift could lead to reduced environmental degradation and contribute to the revitalization of such areas, aligning with broader state and national efforts to manage waste effectively and protect undeveloped land from industrial use.
Summary
House Bill 1132 focuses on the permitting process for new solid waste landfills in New Hampshire. It mandates that applicants proposing landfill sites on greenfields must identify alternative brownfield sites that could serve as reasonable substitutes. This requirement aims to ensure that the public benefit of siting a new landfill is carefully analyzed against existing brownfield options, promoting the remediation of contaminated sites rather than converting undeveloped land for new landfill purposes. The bill reflects a commitment to environmental sustainability and responsible waste management.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding HB 1132 appears to be largely positive among environmental advocates and related organizations. Proponents view the requirement for brownfield identification as a progressive step towards minimizing land use conflicts and enhancing community health and safety. However, there is acknowledgment of concerns from some sectors that the added requirements might complicate the permitting process, potentially delaying necessary waste management solutions in areas reliant on new landfill capacities.
Contention
Notably, the bill does raise some points of contention. Critics argue that the mandated analysis of alternative sites could result in increased regulatory burdens and complexities in the permitting timeline, which might hinder timely landfill developments. Additionally, questions regarding the actual availability and readiness of suitable brownfield sites to meet the demands of waste disposal could further complicate the practical application of this legislation.
Relative to a report by the department of energy on the effectiveness of the system benefits charge and relative to surface water setbacks for landfills and relative to water quality.