New Hampshire 2024 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HB1177

Introduced
12/1/23  
Refer
12/1/23  

Caption

Relative to the electronic filing of domestic violence and stalking petitions in the circuit court family and district court divisions.

Impact

By enforcing electronic filing, HB 1177 is set to impact not only the operation of state court systems but also the accessibility of legal recourse for victims of domestic violence and stalking. The Judicial Branch anticipates that the implementation of this bill will necessitate substantial upgrades to the existing electronic filing system and the hiring of additional personnel to assist users. Specifically, three Court Navigator Service Coordinator positions are projected to be essential for supporting individuals who may struggle with the transition to electronic filing, ensuring that no one is denied access due to technological barriers.

Summary

House Bill 1177 aims to modernize the legal process for handling domestic violence and stalking petitions by mandating electronic filing through the court's system, effective July 1, 2025. The bill proposes that all petitions filed under the provisions of RSA 173-B and RSA 633:3-a will be required to utilize this electronic system, significantly streamlining the submission process for those seeking protective measures under state law. It is intended to enhance efficiency and accessibility within the judicial system for individuals in potentially dangerous situations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1177 is generally positive among supporters who view the modernization of the filing process as a crucial advancement in addressing domestic violence and safeguarding victims' rights. Proponents argue that this measure will facilitate a more user-friendly experience for petitioners, aiming to empower those in need of protection under the law. However, concerns have been raised about the adequacy of support for individuals who may find technological hurdles challenging. The sentiment may vary, particularly among those advocating for improved accessibility to the courts, emphasizing that hardships in filing electronically should be mitigated effectively.

Contention

Notable points of contention center around the bill’s implementation logistics and its potential impact on disadvantaged populations who may not have access to necessary technology or understanding of the electronic system. The provision allowing for exemptions in extraordinary circumstances could address these concerns, but discussions about the adequacy of such exemptions and support systems remain ongoing. Moreover, the fiscal implications of the bill, particularly the anticipated costs for system upgrades and new personnel, raise questions about funding and resource allocation within the state’s budget.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3309

Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an electronic notary public; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.

TX HB1217

Relating to appointment of and performance of notarial acts by an online notary public and online acknowledgment and proof of written instruments; authorizing a fee and creating a criminal offense.

NC S552

Modifications to Notary Public Act

CA AB1667

Electronic wills.

CA AB2961

Civil procedure: electronic filing and service.

LA HB572

Provides for electronic notaries public and electronic notarial acts

CA AB2283

Civil actions: electronic service.

CA SB666

Service of papers: electronic service by court.