Relative to the rate and exemptions of the interest and dividends tax.
If passed, HB192 will effectively reverse recent tax reforms aimed at reducing state revenue from the interest and dividends tax. By reinstating the tax and raising the exemption limits, the bill is expected to affect the state's revenue positively, generating an indeterminable increase in tax collections for fiscal years 2024 through 2029. The fiscal note associated with this bill indicates a potential increase in revenues exceeding $9 million in its first year of enactment, with estimates growing substantially in subsequent years. This could bolster the state's budget, although the exact fiscal impact remains indeterminate due to factors such as taxpayer behavior and revenue credits.
House Bill 192 (HB192) proposes to amend the existing framework for the interest and dividends tax in New Hampshire. This bill aims to repeal the previously established phase-out of this tax, reinstating a 5% tax rate on applicable incomes. Furthermore, it introduces higher income thresholds that determine tax liability, setting the new threshold for taxable interest and dividend income at $7,500, which indicates a substantial increase from the prior threshold of $2,400. Additionally, exemptions for individuals aged 65 and above, as well as those who are blind or disabled, will see significant raises, thereby improving financial relief for these groups.
Debate surrounding HB192 has elicited mixed reactions among stakeholders, with proponents arguing that the increased exemptions and a fixed tax rate provide necessary support to low-income residents, including retirees and the disabled. However, opponents may challenge the reinstatement of the tax as a setback in the broader agenda of tax relief and reform in New Hampshire. There are concerns that increasing tax burdens, even with higher exemptions, could deter investment and economic activity, particularly for those who rely on interest and dividend income as a source of livelihood. The balance between generating necessary state revenue and providing financial relief to lower-income groups will likely remain a focal point of contention during the legislative discussion.