Relative to health insurance coverage of prosthetics for children under 19 years of age.
The bill is expected to have an indeterminable financial impact on state and local government entities as it will likely increase claims costs related to the provision of prosthetic devices. Costs could rise substantially due to the nature of activity-specific prosthetics, which can be expensive, estimated at around $25,000 per user per year. Additional costs are anticipated for repairs and replacements deemed medically necessary. The requirement could potentially affect health benefits offered by government entities and thereby influence overall expenditure on health services.
Senate Bill 177 aims to enhance health insurance coverage by mandating that group insurance policies, health service corporations, and health maintenance organizations provide coverage for prosthetic devices for children under 19 years of age. This includes not only standard prosthetic devices but also activity-specific devices designed for particular activities that may otherwise harm the user’s everyday prosthesis. The legislation seeks to ensure that medically necessary devices are provided without annual limits, significantly broadening the coverage available for young residents of New Hampshire.
The general sentiment surrounding SB 177 is positive, especially among advocates for children's health rights and accessibility. Supporters argue that the bill is a critical step in ensuring that children who need prosthetics can receive the most effective tools for living active lives. However, some concerns might arise regarding the financial implications for insurers and the potential ripple effects on health insurance premiums, which may lead to tensions between advocacy for enhanced coverage and financial feasibility.
Notable points of contention involve potential disagreements over the classification of activities for which special prosthetics are approved and the associated costs of coverage. Insurers may raise concerns about the sustainability of the additional financial burdens imposed by this legislation, particularly if it leads to increased premiums or reduced coverage options for other areas. The balance between providing adequate care for children and maintaining manageable costs within the health insurance system represents a key debate point.