Relative to the practice of dental hygiene.
The passage of HB144 would modify existing regulations under RSA 317-A:21-c, particularly section II(e), ensuring that dental hygienists are properly qualified to administer anesthesia safely. This could enhance patient safety and treatment efficacy by ensuring that only trained and certified individuals perform such procedures. By introducing these qualifications, the bill seeks to improve professional standards within the dental profession, potentially leading to better overall care for patients receiving dental treatments.
House Bill 144 (HB144) aims to regulate the practice of dental hygiene specifically concerning the administration of local anesthesia by dental hygienists. The bill mandates that any dental hygienist must complete specified training and pass an approved examination before they are permitted to administer local anesthesia. This legislative move is being put forth at the request of the Office of Professional Licensure and Certification along with the Board of Dental Examiners, highlighting a need for standardized professional requirements in dental practices.
The sentiment around HB144 appears to be generally favorable, as it emphasizes the importance of proper training and patient safety. Proponents of the bill argue that requiring a formal examination and training will not only uphold professional standards but also assure patients of the competency of the dental hygienists they visit. However, some may raise concerns regarding the accessibility of such training and examinations, which could inadvertently limit the practice of dental hygienists who may not have the resources to meet these new requirements.
While HB144 is primarily aimed at enhancing safety standards, there may be contention regarding the potential bureaucratic implications and the financial burden on dental hygienists pursuing certification. Some stakeholders could argue that the bill could create barriers to practice for well-qualified hygienists who may struggle to manage the additional requirements. Additionally, the bill's implementation needs careful consideration to ensure it does not disproportionately affect access to dental care, particularly in underserved areas.