New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HB389

Introduced
1/10/25  
Refer
1/10/25  
Report DNP
2/6/25  

Caption

Requiring candidates to attest they have not spent more than $1,000 in an election.

Impact

If enacted, HB 389 could significantly impact how candidates register and report their campaign finances. By permitting candidates who spend less than $1,000 to simply attest to their expenditures rather than file detailed financial reports, the bill might reduce administrative burdens for smaller campaigns. However, this also raises concerns about the potential for underreporting, as candidates may be incentivized to keep their spending below this threshold to avoid more rigorous scrutiny.

Summary

House Bill 389 aims to enhance transparency in election financing by requiring candidates to attest that their campaign expenditures do not exceed $1,000 during an election cycle. This bill modifies existing laws surrounding campaign finance reporting, specifically targeting candidates for various offices, including state legislators and county officers. By implementing this regulation, the bill seeks to simplify the reporting process for candidates with lower spending while maintaining a focus on accountability in campaign financing.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 389 appears to be mixed. Proponents argue that the bill will foster greater participation in elections by reducing the regulatory burden on candidates with limited resources, thus encouraging more individuals to run for office. Conversely, opponents express reservations regarding the bill's potential to create loopholes in financial accountability, fearing that it may diminish the overall transparency necessary for public trust in electoral processes.

Contention

A notable point of contention in discussions around HB 389 is the balance between reducing barriers for candidates and ensuring sufficient oversight of campaign financing. Critics have raised concerns that by allowing candidates to avoid detailed reporting, the bill could invite unethical practices or unreported expenditures by those working under the $1,000 limit. The debate underscores broader issues related to campaign finance reform and the intricacies involved in regulating political spending.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NH SB445

Establishing a voter-owned elections fund for eligible candidates to executive councilor and making an appropriation to the fund.

NH HB482

Requiring the use of ballots with embedded security, traceability, and relative to the chain of custody for ballots cast in elections.

NH HB243

Requiring the tabulation of votes in elections to be done in public.

NH HB324

Relative to campaign contributions and expenditures and making an appropriation therefor.

NH HB345

Enabling ranked-choice voting for state party primary elections and municipal elections.

NH HB1596

Requiring a disclosure of deceptive artificial intelligence usage in political advertising.

NH SB534

Relative to campaign finance.

NH SB133

Relative to changing the date of the state primary election and creates runoff election for federal primary election.

NH SB133

Relative to changing the date of the state primary election and creates runoff election for federal primary election.

NH HB345

Enabling ranked-choice voting for state party primary elections and municipal elections.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.