Relative to the filling of vacant positions on elected municipal boards and school boards.
Impact
If enacted, HB562 will integrate this new requirement into multiple sections of the Revised Statutes Annotated (RSA), specifically RSA 671:33 for school district elections and RSA 32:15 concerning budget committee memberships. The effect of this bill could lead to increased accountability and representation, as it gives weight to the preferences of voters indicated in prior elections. Governments may now have a more defined procedure for filling vacancies, potentially improving the stability and responsiveness of municipal and school governance.
Summary
House Bill 562 aims to amend existing laws concerning the filling of vacancies on elected municipal and school boards in New Hampshire. The bill stipulates that if a vacancy arises, and the appointing authority is considering applicants who ran in any of the last three elections, they must first offer the position to the runner-up from the most recent election. This provision intends to ensure that elected positions are filled by individuals who were candidates in the previous elections and reflects a continuity of electoral choice.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears generally positive, particularly among those who advocate for preserving voter choices and promoting democratic governance. Supporters argue that the bill strengthens electoral integrity by allowing those who were previously voted for a position to have priority should a vacancy arise. However, there may be concerns about potential limitations on the appointing authority's discretion, which could provoke debate among lawmakers.
Contention
Notable points of contention regarding HB562 revolve around the implications of prioritizing the runner-up. Critics may argue that this requirement could inadvertently maintain incumbency, as it may prevent fresh candidates from filling vacant positions. Additionally, the necessity for appointing authorities to follow this procedural requirement might be seen as an infringement on their ability to make timely appointments, especially in emergencies where a quick fill is needed.