New Hampshire House Bill HB573

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/16/25
• Refer: 1/16/25
• Report DNP: 3/3/25

Caption

Relative to the funding for search and rescue operations of the fish and game department and making an appropriation therefor.

Impact

The proposed changes are expected to enhance the financial viability of search and rescue efforts, allowing the fish and game department to allocate necessary funds for operations that can encompass vital costs like salaries, training, and equipment. Furthermore, the bill authorizes an investment of $50,000 specifically designated for technology that facilitates the solicitation and collection of donations, broadening the departmental income base. This expanded approach to funding not only promotes immediate operational efficiency but also aims at long-term sustainability through increased community support. The nonlapsing nature of the fund ensures that resources can be appropriated as needed, fostering a proactive rather than reactive funding strategy for search and rescue missions.

Summary

HB573 aims to secure funding for search and rescue operations under the purview of the fish and game department, addressing the need for adequate resources to ensure effective search and rescue services. The bill includes provisions for utilizing general funds in addition to existing registration fees from private boats, off-highway recreational vehicles (OHRVs), and snowmobiles. A significant aspect of the legislation is the appropriation of up to $200,000 annually from the general fund, alongside an authorization for ongoing financial support from the general fund in cases of operational shortfalls. The intent is to maintain a robust funding mechanism for critical search and rescue operations, which is essential in safeguarding public safety in outdoor recreational activities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB573 appears to be supportive, particularly among stakeholders who recognize the importance of reliable search and rescue capabilities in protecting citizens engaging in outdoor activities. Advocates argue that well-funded search and rescue units are crucial for minimizing risks associated with the state's wilderness and recreational areas. However, some concerns may arise regarding the allocation of general fund resources, especially in times of budget constraints where prioritization across various public services is necessary. Overall, there is a recognition that well-managed search and rescue operations can produce significant benefits for the community.

Contention

While there is strong support for enhancing search and rescue funding, there may be discussions on the methodology of revenue collection and the transparency of how funds are utilized. Critics may raise questions about potential inefficiencies or accountability measures for the new appropriation processes. Additionally, the initial investment in donation collection technology may spur debate regarding the return on investment, particularly if donations do not meet anticipated levels. Ensuring that funds are put to effective use in supporting operational needs could be a focal point in the deliberations about HB573.