Requiring background checks of the private companies and their contractors who program and maintain New Hampshire voting machines.
The implementation of HB574 is expected to enhance the integrity of New Hampshire's election process by ensuring that all individuals responsible for the management of voting machines undergo thorough background evaluations. This legislative action seeks to alleviate public concerns regarding election security and potential vulnerabilities in the electoral system. It serves as a proactive measure to build trust within the community and maintain a secure democratic process.
House Bill 574 (HB574) establishes mandatory background checks for personnel associated with the programming and maintenance of electronic ballot counting machines in New Hampshire. The bill requires private companies to provide the Secretary of State and Attorney General with a monthly report listing their employees involved in these operations, along with their identification numbers. These background checks will involve a comprehensive criminal history check to promote transparency and security concerning those who manage electronic voting processes.
Upon review, the sentiment surrounding HB574 appears to be largely supportive among advocates of election security, who consider the bill a crucial step towards safeguarding the integrity of the voting system. However, concerns have been raised by some regarding the practical implications of compliance for private companies and the potential costs that could arise from undergoing extensive background checks and security protocols.
Noteworthy points of contention include debates over the bill's fiscal implications, as preliminary assessments indicate that the costs associated with the background checks may be indeterminate. Furthermore, while proponents view the background check requirements as essential for accountability, opponents may argue that the added administrative burden could deter smaller firms from participating in the election technology market, potentially hindering competition and innovation in the sector.