New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

New Hampshire House Bill HB663

Introduced
1/21/25  
Refer
1/21/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Engrossed
3/12/25  
Refer
3/12/25  

Caption

Allowing the division of historic resources to expend moose plate funds to administer and fund grants.

Impact

If enacted, HB 663 would significantly impact state laws regarding the use of specific funds for historic preservation. By clearly delineating the conditions under which moose plate funds can be allocated, the bill seeks to enhance the capacity of the division of historic resources to support projects that contribute to public knowledge and enjoyment of New Hampshire's heritage. This financial support could potentially lead to better-maintained historical sites and a greater public appreciation of local history.

Summary

House Bill 663 aims to permit the division of historic resources in New Hampshire to utilize moose plate funds for administering and funding grants specifically aimed at the preservation of significant publicly-owned historic properties. The bill specifies that these properties must be at least 50 years old and either listed or eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. The intent behind this legislation is to bolster efforts to protect and maintain the state's historical assets, thereby enriching cultural heritage and community identity.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be positive among advocates of historic preservation. Supporters argue that this measure will provide much-needed resources for maintaining historically significant sites which are crucial for education and tourism. There may also be a collective recognition of the importance of preserving the state's historic landmarks as a testament to New Hampshire's vibrant past.

Contention

While there is widespread support for the notion of historic preservation, some contention may arise regarding the allocation and management of the moose plate funds. Concerns could be voiced about ensuring proper oversight and equitable distribution of grants. Opponents may argue that the processes for selecting properties to receive funding could favor certain projects over others, potentially leading to dissatisfaction among stakeholders wishing to preserve their local heritage.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.