If enacted, HB 683 would significantly alter the existing landscape of OHRV usage on public roads by expanding the counties where these vehicles can operate. The intended effect of this bill is to make it easier for local authorities to allow OHRVs on designated highways, thus promoting recreational activity and tourism. This would amend regulations that currently restrict OHRV access, aligning with broader goals of enhancing outdoor recreational opportunities in New Hampshire.
Summary
House Bill 683 is legislation aimed at regulating the use of off-highway recreational vehicles (OHRVs) in the state of New Hampshire. The bill proposes to amend existing state laws to allow for broader authorization of OHRV operations on various classes of highways, particularly in several counties. One significant change includes the removal of the requirement for petitioners to pay for verified mail notifications to nearby landowners when seeking permission for OHRV use. This aims to simplify the process for municipalities and potentially increase the authorized areas for OHRV operation.
Sentiment
The general sentiment surrounding HB 683 appears to be one of support from recreational groups and businesses that stand to benefit from increased OHRV access. Proponents argue that the bill will facilitate greater recreational engagement and economic development in areas where OHRV usage is common. Conversely, there may be concerns raised by residents and safety advocates about the implications of increased OHRV traffic on traditional roads, particularly regarding safety and roadway maintenance.
Contention
A point of contention regarding HB 683 could arise from the dynamics of local governance, as the bill facilitates decisions made by city and town authorities about OHRV usage. While it streamlines processes for authorization, critics may argue that this could lead to a lack of adequate notification and input from affected property owners. Furthermore, there may be apprehensions about how the increase in OHRV operation might impact road safety for non-OHRV users and the overall infrastructure.
Relative to the issuance of permits for the alteration of driveways exiting onto public ways and relative to the definition of disability or special needs under the child care scholarship program.
Relative to the state 10-year transportation improvement plan; relative to adding a speed limit of 45 miles per hour on rural highways; relative to disability pensions for public safety employees who are victims of violence; and making a capital appropriation to the department of corrections toward the replacement of the New Hampshire state prison for men.