New Hampshire House Bill HCR3

New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/25
• Refer: 1/22/25
• Report Pass: 3/4/25
• Report DNP: 3/4/25

Caption

Applying for a convention of the states under Article V of the Constitution of the United States.

Impact

If enacted, HCR3 would significantly influence the conversation around states' rights versus federal authority in New Hampshire and potentially across other states. It seeks to bring together at least two-thirds of state legislatures to collectively push for amendments that seek to change the dynamics of federal power. The resolution reflects a broader movement that aims to reassert state control and accountability over federal governance, especially in fiscal matters. This could lead to a substantial shift in state-federal relations and initiate discussions on how states can protect their legislative powers against federal encroachments.

Summary

HCR3 is a resolution from New Hampshire that applies for a convention of states under Article V of the United States Constitution. The resolution asserts the authority of state legislators to counter potential abuses of power by the federal government. It highlights concerns surrounding national debt, federal mandates, and the perceived overreach of federal authority into state affairs. The primary aim of the resolution is to propose amendments that would impose fiscal restraints on the federal government, limit its powers and jurisdiction, and establish term limits for federal officials and members of Congress.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HCR3 appears to be supportive from those who advocate for states' rights and decentralization of power. Proponents view it as a necessary step to reclaim authority and safeguard the fiscal responsibility of the federal government. Critics, however, may perceive this resolution as an impractical approach that could lead to further fragmentation and complications in governmental authority. The bill has sparked dialogue not only about the need for fiscal restraints but also about the broader implications of holding a convention of states.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HCR3 include the practicalities and risks associated with convening a constitutional convention. Detractors argue that such a convention could open the door to unintended consequences that might alter key protections within the Constitution. Concerns about who would represent the states at such a convention and the potential for a 'runaway convention'—where any amendment could be proposed beyond the intended scope—are central to the debate. The resolution, while framed as a means of limiting federal authority, raises important questions about safeguarding constitutional integrity while pursuing such significant changes.