New Hampshire 2025 Regular Session

New Hampshire Senate Bill SB105

Introduced
1/22/25  
Refer
1/22/25  
Report Pass
2/19/25  
Engrossed
3/28/25  
Refer
3/28/25  
Report Pass
4/30/25  
Report DNP
4/30/25  
Enrolled
6/16/25  
Chaptered
6/25/25  

Caption

Enabling towns to adopt budget caps.

Impact

If adopted, SB105 will significantly alter the municipal governance landscape by ensuring that town budgets remain in line with inflation and population changes without unchecked increases. The cap will help municipalities control financial spending while providing members of the town with a voice in financial decisions, as budget caps can only be overridden through specific voting procedures. The legislation specifically sets parameters for using previous per resident expenditures and inflation indices, creating a standardized method across participating towns.

Summary

Senate Bill 105 is a proposed act aimed at providing towns in New Hampshire the ability to implement budget caps. This legislation introduces new sections to the Municipal Budget Law (RSA 32), allowing towns to limit their budget appropriations based on a formula that incorporates current town population and a fixed percentage increase for inflation. This structured approach aims to provide a manageable and predictable fiscal environment within municipalities, enabling residents to have a clearer understanding of budgetary limits over time.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around SB105 appears largely supportive among proponents who argue that it will foster greater fiscal responsibility and transparency at the local levels. Supporters believe that having a budget cap will help curb excessive spending by local governments and help residents understand financial trends. However, some lawmakers and municipal leaders are concerned about the potential limitations this might impose on towns' flexibility to respond to unforeseen expenses or emergencies, leading to a mixed response.

Contention

Notable points of contention arise from fears that budget caps may restrict local governments' abilities to fund essential services adequately, particularly in cases of economic downturns or rising costs that exceed the set limits. Opponents argue that strict budget caps could lead to reduced public services or hinder the ability of elected officials to respond to community needs in a timely manner. The balance between budgetary control and flexibility remains a critical debate as stakeholders assess the implications of SB105 on local governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

NH SB383

Relative to local tax caps.

NH SB155

Relative to the adoption of school administrative unit budgets.

NH HB563

Relative to the adoption of school administrative unit budgets.

NH SB536

Enabling no-excuse absentee registration and voting.

NH HB345

Enabling ranked-choice voting for state party primary elections and municipal elections.

NH HB345

Enabling ranked-choice voting for state party primary elections and municipal elections.

NH HB294

Enabling municipalities to adopt a child tax credit.

NH SB63

Enabling municipalities to adopt a tax credit for qualified private community property owners.

NH HB95

Enabling municipalities to adopt rental practice regulations.

NH HB1034

Relative to enabling municipalities to adopt a homestead property tax exemption.

Similar Bills

CO SB237

Ballot Measure Campaign Finance

NJ A4739

Requires ballot question on approval of State bond issue to disclose total amount of debt of State or other entity, debt service on which is funded through annual State appropriation.

NJ S522

Requires ballot question on approval of State bond issue to disclose total amount of debt of State or other entity, debt service on which is funded through annual State appropriation.

NJ S194

Requires ballot question on approval of State bond issue to disclose total amount of debt of State or other entity, debt service on which is funded through annual State appropriation.

CA SB658

Jury selection.

CA AB1541

Examination of prospective jurors.

HI SB1031

Relating To Advisory Referendums.

CA AB1744

Evidence: examination of witnesses.