Requires AG to arrange for certain testing of facial recognition systems.
Impact
If enacted, A1998 will have implications on how facial recognition systems are utilized within the state. The requirement for testing and auditing means that state law enforcement and agencies considering the use of such technologies must operate within a framework that promotes accountability and accuracy. The introduction of this bill signals a move towards ensuring that technology used in public safety does not perpetuate systemic biases, which has been a key concern highlighted in public discourse surrounding surveillance technologies.
Summary
A1998 is a bill that mandates the New Jersey Attorney General to arrange for independent, third-party testing and auditing of the five most commonly available facial recognition systems. The primary objective of this testing is to evaluate the accuracy of these systems under operational conditions, specifically to uncover any statistically significant variations in performance based on factors such as race, skin tone, ethnicity, gender, or age. The findings from this testing are critical as they will inform the legislature about potential biases in facial recognition technology, which has garnered significant scrutiny for issues related to accuracy across different demographic groups.
Contention
The bill's potential impact is likely to draw both support and opposition. Proponents argue that the legislation is necessary to ensure ethical standards and protect against bias in law enforcement applications of facial recognition technology. They emphasize the need for transparency and accountability in systems that can significantly affect individuals' lives. On the other hand, some may criticize the bill as an impediment to technological advancement or argue that it could hinder law enforcement capabilities by delaying the deployment of facial recognition systems that could enhance public safety. These differing perspectives highlight the complexities associated with balancing technological progress and civil liberties.