New Jersey Assembly Bill A2190

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/7/22
• Refer: 2/7/22
• Refer: 9/15/22
• Refer: 6/8/23
• Refer: 6/22/23
• Report Pass: 6/27/23
• Report Pass: 6/28/23
• Engrossed: 6/30/23
• Enrolled: 6/30/23
• Chaptered: 6/30/23
• Passed: 6/30/23

Caption

Extends authorization for Internet gaming law to 2028.

Impact

The extension articulated in A2190 has substantial implications for state laws, particularly those governing gambling and gaming enforcement. The bill reauthorizes the framework initially established by the Internet gaming law, originally put in place in 2013 (P.L.2013, c.27). This means that operators would have clearer guidelines and longer terms to facilitate online gambling, thus encouraging more investment and stability within the gaming industry, which also benefits job creation and related economic activities.

Summary

Bill A2190 aims to extend the authorization for Internet gaming in New Jersey through 2028 by amending existing gaming laws. The bill modifies the timeline under which online gaming can operate, adjusted from its previous expiration, effectively allowing for the continuation and growth of this sector. The legislation serves to prolong the financial benefits associated with online gaming, which has become a significant source of revenue for the state since its inception.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding A2190 appears to be largely positive, particularly from stakeholders within the gaming industry and state revenue departments. They argue that a prolonged authorization period helps stabilize the market and ensures continued influx to the state's coffers. Nonetheless, there may be concerns from community advocates regarding the social impacts of extended internet gaming—such as addiction and its effects on vulnerable populations—though these worries did not heavily influence the overall legislative process.

Contention

One notable point of contention involves balancing the economic benefits against potential social costs. While proponents of the bill emphasize the financial advantages of extending internet gaming, critics worry that the pervasive nature of online gaming could lead to increased addiction rates and other societal issues. The discussions reflect a broader conversation about the role of gaming in the state, as legislators weigh the benefits of revenue generation against the responsibilities of public welfare.