New Jersey Assembly Bill A2770

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/28/22
• Refer: 2/28/22
• Refer: 3/9/23
• Report Pass: 3/20/23

Caption

Authorizes issuance of protective orders for certain victimized persons in situations for which domestic violence statutes do not apply due to lack of familial or dating relationship between victim and offending actor.

Impact

Through this bill, New Jersey law would be amended to expand the criteria under which individuals can seek protective orders, thereby enhancing legal protections for victims who previously lacked access to such measures. The significance of this change lies in acknowledging that the threats and harms associated with sexual violence can often occur outside traditional family or intimate partner contexts. Consequently, individuals frequently find themselves without critical protection under existing laws, which this bill aims to rectify.

Summary

Assembly Bill A2770 aims to authorize the issuance of protective orders for individuals who find themselves victimized in situations where domestic violence statutes do not apply due to the absence of a familial or dating relationship between the victim and the offending party. The bill seeks to provide necessary legal recourse to individuals who experience nonconsensual sexual contact, sexual penetration, lewdness, stalking, or cyber-harassment, which are forms of violence typically unaddressed within the scope of conventional domestic violence laws.

Sentiment

Public sentiment surrounding A2770 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among advocates for victims of sexual violence and organizations focused on women's rights. Proponents argue that the bill is a vital step towards ensuring comprehensive protections for all individuals facing harassment or violence, regardless of their relationship with the perpetrator. This has been echoed by advocates who view the expansion of protective orders as a necessary measure in promoting survivor rights and safety.

Contention

However, some concerns have been raised regarding potential abuse of protective orders under this expanded definition. Critics caution that provisions allowing individuals to seek protective orders without a familial or dating relationship could lead to an increase in frivolous claims, potentially straining court resources. These arguments reflect broader debates about the balance between protecting victims and safeguarding the rights of individuals who may be wrongfully accused.