"Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Act"; requires Internet-connected devices to have blocking capability in certain circumstances.
Impact
This legislation would alter the existing landscape of consumer fraud regulations by creating specific legal obligations for those who produce or distribute internet-enabled devices. Failure to comply with these new requirements could result in significant financial penalties, up to $20,000 for repeat offenses. The bill not only seeks to protect children from harmful content but also aims to ameliorate the conditions surrounding human trafficking by prohibiting access to websites known for facilitating such activities. Through these measures, the bill strengthens protections for minors and elevates accountability for manufacturers in the realm of online safety.
Summary
The bill A2952, also known as the 'Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Act', seeks to enhance internet safety by mandating that certain internet-connected devices include digital blocking capabilities. This provision is aimed at preventing minors from accessing obscene material online. Manufacturers, sellers, and distributors of these internet-accessible products are required to ensure that their digital blocking tools work effectively and to take active measures in safeguarding against harmful content. Key aspects of the bill include establishing a reporting mechanism to handle unblocked obscene content and ensuring that child and revenge pornography remain inaccessible through their products.
Contention
There could be potential points of contention surrounding this bill, particularly regarding the implementation and viability of the digital blocking systems mandated by the legislation. Concerns may arise about the effectiveness of these blocks in keeping out all obscene material, which can be challenging given the constantly changing nature of online content. Additionally, the requirement for manufacturers to establish and fund a reporting system could be seen as an imposed burden, and debates may arise about the fairness and feasibility of passing associated costs onto consumers.
Additional_notes
The bill also authorizes the Attorney General and consumers to pursue civil action in cases where the blocking measures fail, allowing for damages up to $500 for unaddressed reports of obscene content. This dimension adds a layer of enforcement that enhances the overall intention of the bill to protect children and combat exploitation online.
Same As
"Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Act"; requires Internet-connected devices to have blocking capability in certain circumstances.
Enacts the "Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Act" relative to requiring retailers of internet capable devices to install a digital blocking capability prior to sale or lease to a consumer
Human trafficking and child exploitation; creating the Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Act; directing retailers of Internet-enabled devices to equip products with certain filters; codification; effective date.
Human trafficking and child exploitation; creating the Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Act; directing retailers of Internet-enabled devices to equip products with certain filters; codification; effective date.
Human trafficking and child exploitation; creating the Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Act; directing retailers of Internet-enabled devices to equip products with certain filters; codification; effective date.
Enacts the "Human Trafficking and Child Exploitation Prevention Act" relative to requiring retailers of internet capable devices to install a digital blocking capability prior to sale or lease to a consumer
Relating to requiring certain retailers to ensure that certain products sold or leased by the retailers contain a digital blocking capability that renders obscene material inaccessible; creating a criminal offense.