Authorizes common law public nuisance suits regarding lead paint under State law; exempts Attorney General from certain aspects of public nuisance claims when pursuing lead paint actions.
The bill addresses gaps highlighted by the New Jersey Supreme Court's 2007 ruling, which indicated that municipalities could not sue lead paint manufacturers under common law for damages due to the limitations of the lead paint act. By permitting these public nuisance claims, A659 is expected to enhance the ability of the state to hold manufacturers accountable for the harms caused by lead paint, particularly in residential settings. This could lead to increased legal actions against manufacturers, creating potential financial liabilities for those companies involved.
Assembly Bill A659 aims to amend existing New Jersey laws related to lead paint by allowing common law public nuisance suits against lead paint manufacturers. The bill authorizes the Attorney General to pursue these suits without being restricted to injunctive relief, thereby enabling the recovery of damages linked to the sale and distribution of lead paint. This legislative change marks a significant shift in the approach to lead paint liability in the state, reflecting ongoing concerns over public health related to lead exposure.
While supporters argue that A659 is essential for protecting public health and addressing historical injustices related to lead poisonings, critics may view the bill as potentially fostering a wave of litigation that could adversely affect businesses. Additionally, the exemption of the Attorney General from demonstrating certain liabilities might raise concerns about the fairness and accountability of the legal process. The bill reflects a broader trend towards increasing governmental powers in pursuing public health-related disputes, which could ignite discussions about the balance between public interests and business freedoms.