Declares that Fish and Game Council's rule allowing use of enclosed foothold traps is not consistent with legislative intent.
If ACR164 passes, it will mandate the Fish and Game Council to amend or withdraw the regulation that permits enclosed foothold traps within 30 days. This action reinforces the legislative intent aimed at animal welfare and aligns current trapping regulations with ethical treatment standards. The resolution underscores the state's commitment to preventing cruelty against animals used in trapping and emphasizes the responsibility of legislative bodies to oversee regulatory compliance with existing laws.
ACR164 is a concurrent resolution introduced in the New Jersey Legislature that declares a specific rule by the Fish and Game Council regarding the use of enclosed foothold traps to be inconsistent with legislative intent as expressed in prior laws. The resolution argues that these traps, despite being classified as live-capture, function similarly to banned steel-jaw leghold traps, causing significant injury to animals. The introduction of this resolution seeks to uphold animal welfare standards set forth by previous legislation, specifically P.L.1984, c.37, which prohibited such forms of trapping due to their cruel nature.
The primary contention surrounding ACR164 relates to differing views on animal trapping methods. Proponents of the resolution advocate for higher ethical standards and argue that enclosed foothold traps do not meet the humane criteria established by New Jersey law. Conversely, those who support the use of such traps may argue for their efficacy and necessity in certain trapping circumstances, thus sparking debate about animal rights versus practical animal management solutions. This legislative deliberation embodies broader discussions about animal welfare legislation and its enforcement within the state.