Condemns federal rule proposal that would force families of mixed immigration status who reside in certain affordable housing to either separate or face eviction.
Impact
The proposed HUD rule intended to screen residents' immigration status and could lead to the eviction of families with ineligible members within 18 months. According to HUD's analysis, this could potentially affect over 55,000 children who are U.S. citizens or qualified for housing benefits. The resolution highlights that while the rule aims for data accuracy in subsidy allocation, it could lead to resource misallocation in implementing these requirements, ultimately resulting in a decrease in the quality and quantity of available assisted housing.
Summary
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 67 (ACR67) is a legislative initiative from New Jersey that condemns a proposed rule by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) aimed at prohibiting mixed-status families from residing in federally-subsidized housing. Mixed-status families are defined as those households that include members eligible and ineligible for housing assistance due to their immigration status. The resolution argues against the potential separation of families or eviction resulting from this federal rule, emphasizing that this situation could arise from individuals in the household having varying immigration statuses.
Conclusion
In light of these considerations, ACR67 calls for the President and Congress to focus on increasing investments in affordable housing for families regardless of immigration status, rather than pursuing policies that threaten family unity and exacerbate housing insecurity. The resolution serves to formally communicate New Jersey's stance against the federal housing rule, advocating for protecting the rights of vulnerable populations against legislative actions that could lead to widespread eviction and instability.
Contention
ACR67 underscores significant concerns regarding the operational burden that the HUD proposal would impose on housing authorities and owners of assisted properties. The resolution critiques the financial implications of forced evictions — where families deemed mixed-status would receive prorated shares of housing subsidies, potentially incurring additional costs to the system. There is a belief that enforcing such a rule could divert critical resources away from housing maintenance and resident services, worsening the existing affordable housing crisis in New Jersey and across the nation.
Condemns federal rule proposal that would force families of mixed immigration status who reside in certain affordable housing to either separate or face eviction.
Condemns US Department of Homeland Security's proposed regulations that would allow consideration of credit reports and scores in immigration decisions.