Proposes constitutional amendment to limit effective period of certain emergency orders, rules, or regulations issued by Governor to 14 days.
If enacted, ACR82 will alter existing state law by establishing clear boundaries for the issuance of emergency regulations. This change aims to balance the need for quick and decisive action during emergencies against the necessity of legislative oversight and accountability. Such a measure is particularly relevant following experiences during recent public health emergencies where the swift actions of the Governor faced scrutiny from various stakeholders concerned about the breadth and duration of executive powers. The proposal specifies exceptions wherein the Governor can still act without a time limit, such as commands relating to the New Jersey National Guard or federal mandates, potentially mitigating some of the fears regarding federal and state coordination during disasters.
Assembly Concurrent Resolution No. 82 (ACR82) proposes a significant change to the New Jersey Constitution by limiting the effectiveness of certain emergency orders, rules, or regulations issued by the Governor to a duration of 14 days. This amendment directly addresses the powers of the Governor during emergencies, which have been largely unchecked, allowing for open-ended orders that could potentially lead to prolonged governmental actions without legislative approval. Under this proposed amendment, any emergency order would automatically expire after 14 days unless the Legislature, through a concurrent resolution, grants approval for an extension, effectively imposing legislative oversight on executive actions during emergencies.
Debate surrounding ACR82 may focus on the ramifications of such a constitutional limitation. Supporters of the amendment argue that it ensures checks and balances between branches of government, thus preventing the potential for abusive, unregulated use of emergency powers by the executive branch. Critics, however, might contend that this limit could hinder the state's ability to respond swiftly and effectively to emergencies, stressing that flexibility is necessary to manage unforeseen challenges effectively. Furthermore, certain groups may emphasize the importance of maintaining state authority over disaster response, which might be compromised if legislative approval is required for extensions beyond 14 days.