Proposes amendment to State Constitution to provide for elected State Comptroller and eliminate Office of State Auditor.
If enacted, this amendment would significantly alter the landscape of state governance in New Jersey by creating a separate executive department for the State Comptroller, who would be tasked with various financial oversight responsibilities. The duties of the State Comptroller would include conducting routine audits, reviewing contracts, and leading investigations into financial misconduct within state agencies. The shift from an appointed to an elected official is expected to promote transparency and integrity in the state’s financial practices, empowering the Comptroller to act independently in safeguarding public funds. The first election under this amendment would take place in 2020, with the selected official serving a four-year term.
ACR95 proposes a constitutional amendment to provide for the direct election of the State Comptroller by the citizens of New Jersey. Currently, the State Comptroller is appointed by the Governor for a six-year term. This amendment seeks to enhance the independence of this position by making it an elected office, which would grant the State Comptroller broader authority and more accountability directly to the public instead of being influenced by the executive branch. The amendment also explicitly abolishes the position of State Auditor, as the duties of that office overlap significantly with those of the State Comptroller. By consolidating these roles, the bill aims to streamline government operations and reduce redundancy in auditing functions.
This constitutional amendment has sparked debates regarding the balance of power between the Governor and the Comptroller. Proponents argue that the change is necessary to create a true fiscal watchdog that operates independently and is directly accountable to the voters. Critics, however, might express concerns about potential political motivations affecting the impartiality of the office, suggesting that such an elected position could prioritize political considerations over objective accountability. Furthermore, the elimination of the State Auditor's office raises questions about the roles of these positions and whether consolidating authority could lead to less oversight rather than more.