Urges Congress enact Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act.
The resolution aims to highlight the inequity embedded in the current legislation, particularly affecting those who lost their spouses in service-related conditions. By calling for the enactment of the Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act, the resolution seeks to repeal these offset provisions, effectively allowing survivors to receive both SBP and DIC without penalty. This change would restore approximately $15,828 annually, helping military families rely on the benefits they have been assured and affirming the nation's commitment to its service members and their families.
Assembly Resolution No. 21 (AR21) urges Congress to enact the Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act, addressing the unfair financial burden placed on surviving spouses of military members. Under current federal law, these spouses are required to forfeit portions of their Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity when they receive Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) from the Department of Veterans Affairs. This provision means that for every dollar they receive in DIC, they lose an equal amount from their SBP annuity, placing significant financial strain on many families who have already sacrificed for the nation.
In summary, AR21 serves as an important appeal to rectify systemic inequities faced by military survivors, pushing for legislative action that would ensure fair treatment in financial compensation policies. If passed, the Military Surviving Spouses Equity Act would potentially return financial peace of mind to countless military families, affirming the ethos that those who serve their country should be respected and supported even after their sacrifice.
There is notable support for AR21 among sponsors and supporters who argue that military personnel and their families should not be financially punished after such sacrifices. Conversely, discussions around the resolution might invoke concerns about budget implications, as increasing benefits could also require additional funding and resources at the federal level. Advocates emphasize that the current offset is not only financially burdensome but also undermines the promise made to military members about their family's future security.