New Jersey Senate Bill S228

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Establishes task force to study issues facing returning members of US Armed Forces, NJ National Guard, and reserve component of US Armed Forces; creates permanent commission to study various definitions related to veteran status.

Impact

The bill's establishment of a permanent study commission focuses on reviewing and potentially revising the statutory definitions associated with veteran status. This commission's work will include analyzing the existing definitions of 'veteran,' 'disabled veteran,' and 'service-disabled veteran' in New Jersey statutes, identifying restrictive requirements, and recommending changes that could lead to more uniform and inclusive definitions. The impact of these revisions could result in improved access to resources and benefits for veterans across the state, ensuring they receive adequate support.

Summary

Senate Bill 228 establishes a task force aimed at addressing the challenges faced by returning members of the United States Armed Forces, the New Jersey National Guard, and reserve components. This task force is designed to collect data and insights regarding the physical, emotional, and mental health impacts of military service on service members and their families, particularly those who have been deployed in overseas conflicts like Afghanistan and Iraq. It aims to promote discussions that will lead to effective policies and support mechanisms that cater to the unique needs of these individuals as they reintegrate into civilian life.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 228 may arise from differing opinions on how best to support veterans. Some legislators may advocate for more comprehensive measures that extend beyond basic provisions, such as enhancing mental health services and community integration programs. Others might argue about the funding implications and the scope of the task force's recommendations, raising concerns about the effectiveness of proposed changes versus the potential burden on state resources.