Requires court to order financial support for child if child's parent or guardian is killed by drunk driver.
Impact
The bill proposes changes to existing laws regarding vehicular homicide, particularly N.J.S.2C:11-5, ensuring that financial obligations are placed on individuals convicted of contributing to a child's loss of guardianship through reckless or intoxicated driving. In establishing what financial support should cover, courts are encouraged to take into account various factors including the deceased's income levels, the child’s accustomed standard of living, and specific needs such as educational costs. This legal requirement is expected to have significant implications for sentencing practices, as courts will now have to assess the potential financial impact on vulnerable minors.
Summary
Senate Bill 2679 mandates that courts order financial support for minor children if their parent or guardian is killed by a drunk driver convicted of reckless vehicular homicide. The legislation aims to establish a legal framework ensuring that children of victims receive necessary financial assistance following such tragic occurrences. The bill emphasizes the importance of supporting these children to maintain their standard of living and address their emotional and educational needs, given the hardships posed by the loss of a guardian.
Contention
Although the intent behind S2679 is to protect bereaved families, there may be concerns regarding the additions to the penal system, especially about the implications for defendants who might be struggling financially themselves. Questions may arise surrounding how these support payments are structured, the enforcement of payment obligations during and after incarceration, and how the financial responsibilities align with existing restitution frameworks in cases of vehicular homicide. There might also be debates on whether this could dissuade plea agreements that remove the burden of ongoing financial support obligations.
"Daniel Kearney's Law"; establishes criminal penalties for driving in violation of probationary driver's license restrictions in certain circumstances.
Concerns pretrail and post-trial considerations for certain crimes involving operation of vehicles, including rebuttable presumption for pretrial detention, pretial recommendation of no release from detention, suspension or revocation of license, and vehicle forfeiture.