New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

New Jersey Senate Bill S3476

Introduced
1/12/23  
Refer
1/12/23  

Caption

Concerns licensing of security officer companies.

Impact

The implementation of S3476 is anticipated to strengthen regulatory measures within the private security industry. By making it mandatory for security officer companies to provide comprehensive information about their operators and their backgrounds, the bill seeks to protect the public from potential abuses or misconduct that can arise from poorly managed security entities. The changes could redefine operational standards for private security firms, aligning them more closely with public safety expectations.

Summary

Senate Bill S3476 focuses on the licensing requirements for security officer companies in New Jersey. The bill amends the existing law set forth in P.L.2004, c.134, and aims to enhance accountability and oversight in the private security sector. It stipulates that security officer companies must be licensed by the superintendent of the Division of State Police, implementing a detailed application process that includes the necessity for criminal history checks for owners and operators, aiming to ensure they possess the requisite moral character and integrity for such roles.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB S3476 appears to lean towards supporting enhanced regulation within the security industry. Advocates of the bill argue that these changes are crucial for fostering public trust in private security services and preventing instances of unlicensed or unscrupulous operators. However, there may also be concerns raised by business owners about the burden of compliance, including the costs associated with licensing and the potential for increased regulatory hurdles.

Contention

Notable points of contention regarding this bill include the balance between necessary regulation and the operational freedoms of private security companies. Some stakeholders may worry that excessive regulations could stifle business growth or inhibit smaller firms from entering the market. Additionally, there might be debates regarding the thresholds for criminal disqualifications, as this could affect the availability of qualified personnel in the industry.

Companion Bills

NJ A5094

Same As Concerns licensing of security officer companies.

Previously Filed As

NJ A5094

Concerns licensing of security officer companies.

NJ A2379

Concerns licensing of security officer companies.

NJ A4194

Concerns licensing of law enforcement officers; appropriates $6 million.

NJ S2742

Concerns licensing of law enforcement officers; appropriates $6 million.

NJ HB06564

An Act Concerning Security Service Officers.

NJ AB580

Security services: limited liability companies.

NJ AB229

Private investigators, proprietary security services, private security services, and alarm companies: training: use of force.

NJ HB06624

An Act Concerning Retired Police And Parole Officers Providing School Security And Peace Officers Carrying Firearms On School Property.

NJ SB390

School safety: school security officers and security guards.

NJ HB1262

Regulate Private Security Officers & Agencies

Similar Bills

NJ A2379

Concerns licensing of security officer companies.

NJ A5094

Concerns licensing of security officer companies.

LA HB650

Provides relative to the organization of the state Department of Education (EN SEE FISC NOTE GF EX See Note)

NJ S2147

Concerns appointment of certain superintendents of weights and measures.

NJ A2051

Concerns appointment of certain superintendents of weights and measures.

NJ A3467

Clarifies that background check is required for renewal of security officer registration.

NJ A3468

Requires drug testing for security officer registration.

NJ S4498

Establishes Department of State Police.