New Jersey Senate Bill S4186

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/4/23
• Refer: 12/4/23

Caption

Requires DEP to evaluate cumulative impact of stormwater when reviewing applications associated with warehouse and other high-density development projects.

Impact

The implementation of S4186 would require the DEP to reassess its permitting processes, particularly for warehouse developments that are typically associated with high levels of stormwater runoff. Key directives of the bill include the management of stormwater to promote ground water recharge, minimize runoff to neighboring properties, preserve the biological integrity of stream channels, and prevent pollution increases. This could substantially alter how developments are approved and how local authorities can manage land use to mitigate environmental impacts. It places additional regulatory responsibilities on the DEP to ensure protective measures are in place for affected communities.

Summary

Senate Bill S4186, introduced in New Jersey on December 4, 2023, mandates the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) to evaluate the cumulative impact of stormwater when reviewing applications related to warehouse and other high-density development projects. The bill aims to ensure that the environmental consequences of such developments are scrutinized not just within the locality of the proposed project but also across adjoining municipalities and the broader watershed. This reflects a growing concern over the environmental impact of high-density developments, which often lead to significant stormwater runoff and related issues.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding S4186 may arise related to the balance between environmental protections and economic development. Proponents of the bill argue that it is essential for safeguarding local ecosystems, while opponents may express concerns over potential delays and increased costs in project approvals. Additionally, there may be discussions regarding the level of scrutiny applied to developments, with some advocating for looser regulations to foster economic growth versus those calling for stricter measures to protect local environments. This tension reflects broader debates on land use and environmental stewardship within the state.