New Jersey Senate Bill S722

New Jersey 2022-2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22
• Report Pass: 5/19/22
• Refer: 5/19/22
• Report Pass: 6/27/22
• Engrossed: 6/29/22
• Enrolled: 6/29/22
• Chaptered: 6/30/22
• Passed: 6/30/22

Caption

Codifies and expands ARRIVE Together Pilot Program to make certain mental health services available to police responding to certain emergencies; appropriates $2 million.

Impact

The implementation of S722 will have significant implications for state laws, particularly in how law enforcement agencies are equipped to handle mental health crises. It establishes a framework for integrating mental health resources within police operations, potentially leading to more effective crisis intervention strategies. The bill mandates the selection of participating municipalities by the Attorney General, ensuring a diverse geographic representation across the state, which can enhance the overall effectiveness of mental health response initiatives.

Summary

Bill S722, officially known as the ARRIVE Together Crisis Response Pilot Program Act, seeks to enhance the provision of mental health services available to law enforcement personnel when responding to emergencies involving mental health or substance use crises. The legislation appropriates $2 million to implement and expand the pilot program, facilitating contracts with mental health service providers. Through this initiative, a more structured response mechanism is established for law enforcement agencies, aiming to improve the outcomes of police interactions with individuals in crisis.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding the bill is largely positive, reflecting a broad recognition of the need to improve mental health crisis responses. Supporters of the bill argue that it addresses critical gaps in services currently available to law enforcement and individuals in crisis, advocating for a proactive approach that prioritizes mental health. However, there may be underlying concerns regarding the adequacy of funding and the ability of municipal agencies to effectively implement the program as intended.

Contention

Despite the positive reception, contention may arise around the practical aspects of executing the bill. Key points of contention include concerns over the sustainability of funding and the qualifications and training of the mental health providers involved in the program. Critics may argue that without sufficient resources or structured oversight, the initiative could fall short of its intended goals, leading to continued gaps in effective crisis intervention. The legislation calls for a follow-up report evaluating the program, which will be crucial to address these potential challenges.