New Jersey Assembly Bill A192

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/9/24

Caption

Prohibits use of private funds and personnel in governmental offices and procedures pertaining to administration of elections; establishes crimes and penalties for violations.

Impact

If enacted, A192 would significantly restrict how election administration is funded, delineating that only state or federal funds can be used for these purposes. This would create a clear separation between private funding sources and election operations, aiming to counteract any possible manipulation of electoral processes through private contributions. It would also prevent private individuals from self-appointing themselves in roles that could influence the determination of ballot eligibility, ensuring that such duties remain with authorized public officials.

Summary

Assembly Bill 192 (A192) aims to enhance the integrity of election administration in New Jersey by prohibiting the use of private funds and personnel in governmental election procedures. The bill establishes that no government entity, including the State, counties, municipalities, and school districts, can accept or utilize funds from private entities for electoral processes like preparing, administering, or conducting elections. The intent behind this legislation is to mitigate public concerns regarding the influence of private interests in the election process and to promote trust in the electoral system.

Contention

The bill is modeled on legislation that has been implemented in several other states, reflecting a nationwide trend to address concerns surrounding private donations during elections. However, the prohibition of private funding could raise issues regarding the sufficiency of public funding for electoral processes, especially in local jurisdictions that may rely on additional resources to effectively conduct elections. Critics may argue that these restrictions could hinder the ability of local officials to conduct thorough elections, while proponents contend that it is necessary for safeguarding democracy and ensuring electoral fairness.