New Jersey Assembly Bill A3404

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/24
• Refer: 2/1/24

Caption

Requires State parks, forests, and other natural and historic areas to remain open to public for seven days if emergency is declared due to failure to enact general appropriation law as prescribed by NJ Constitution.

Note

In summary, A3404 is a proactive legislative effort to protect public access to recreational spaces during emergencies that stem from fiscal failures. By establishing clear guidelines and responsibilities, the bill seeks to ensure that state resources remain available to the public, thus balancing fiscal responsibility with community needs.

Impact

The implementation of A3404 is poised to significantly influence state laws regarding emergency management and public access to natural resources. If passed, the bill would require the Commissioner of Environmental Protection to formulate a plan for the operation of all State parks and forests during a budgetary crisis. This plan will help identify essential state employees necessary to maintain services at these locations, thereby safeguarding the continuity of public access during potentially disruptive governmental events.

Summary

Assembly Bill A3404, introduced by Assemblywoman Dawn Fantasia, aims to ensure that State parks, forests, and other natural and historic areas remain accessible to the public during a declared state of emergency that arises from the failure to enact a general appropriation law. Specifically, this bill mandates that these sites remain open for no more than seven calendar days if such an emergency is declared. This stipulation is in accordance with Article VIII, Section II, paragraph 2 of the New Jersey Constitution, which governs state funding and appropriations.

Contention

Although A3404 is aimed at providing ongoing access to natural and historic sites, it may have points of contention among legislators and stakeholders. Proponents argue that ensuring access to these areas during emergencies is vital for public well-being and psychological relief, especially during times of crisis. However, some critics may question the practicality of maintaining staff and services at these locations without sufficient funding, arguing that resource allocation should prioritize critical services during a budget shortfall.