Designated the Equitable Disclosure Act of 2010, modifies provisions of MLUL concerning objectors to applications for development.
Impact
If enacted, AB A3435 would significantly affect how land use decisions are made and challenged at the local level in New Jersey. By requiring objectors to disclose their affiliations and possible interests, the legislation aims to deter the use of strategic delays in the approval process, which can arise from economic competitors with no substantive land-use objections. This change is expected to promote fairness and transparency, encouraging a more straightforward review process that considers the genuine concerns of all stakeholders involved.
Summary
Assembly Bill A3435, known as the Equitable Disclosure Act, seeks to modify the provisions of the Municipal Land Use Law (MLUL) regarding the disclosure obligations of objectors to development applications. The bill aims to create a more equitable and transparent process by ensuring that both applicants and objectors are subject to similar disclosure requirements during land use approvals and appeals. By doing so, it attempts to reduce the number of instances in which economic competitors interfere with development approvals through non-transparent means.
Contention
However, the bill has sparked debate among stakeholders. Proponents argue that it addresses a long-standing issue of misuse within the land use approval process, which they claim has been exploited by parties aiming to obstruct development through obscure means. On the other hand, critics express concern that the added disclosure requirements could deter legitimate community engagement and suppress the voices of smaller, less organized objectors who may struggle to meet the new transparency standards. The balancing act between transparency and the right to challenge development remains a significant point of contention in discussions surrounding this bill.
Provides that solar and photovoltaic energy facilities and structures on farmland are not inherently beneficial use, per se, for purposes of zoning approvals.
Provides that solar and photovoltaic energy facilities and structures on farmland are not inherently beneficial use, per se, for purposes of zoning approvals.