New Jersey Assembly Bill A4623

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 6/24/24
• Refer: 6/24/24
• Report Pass: 6/26/24

Caption

Concerns law protecting residential tenants from lead-based paint hazards.

Impact

The bill would significantly impact the state’s housing regulations, shifting some responsibilities onto landlords and municipalities to ensure that inspections for lead hazards are conducted regularly. Municipalities would be required to establish processes for inspecting both common areas and individual units, and they may also charge landlords inspection fees. This regulatory framework intends not only to elevate standards of tenant safety but also to ensure accountability among property owners regarding environmental hazards in their holdings.

Summary

Assembly Bill A4623 aims to enhance protections for residential tenants in New Jersey by addressing lead-based paint hazards. Introduced by Assemblyman Clinton Calabrese, the bill seeks to amend existing laws related to lead hazards in rental properties and establishes new programs for inspecting and mitigating these risks. The implementation of lead inspection protocols during tenant turnover is a paramount aspect of this legislation, ensuring that properties are assessed for lead risks before new tenants move in, thereby safeguarding their health and safety.

Sentiment

General sentiment around A4623 appears to lean towards support, particularly from tenant advocacy groups and health organizations that prioritize the protection of residents from potential lead exposure. However, concerns may arise from landlords regarding the potential financial impact of increased inspection costs and compliance obligations. The balance between tenant safety and property owner rights will be a focal point in discussions about this bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include the financial implications for landlords who may be required to conduct regular inspections and remedial actions if lead hazards are found. Critics argue that mandatory lead inspections could be burdensome for smaller landlords or those operating on tight margins. Additionally, the adequacy of the educational programs proposed to inform stakeholders about their rights and responsibilities under these new regulations may also be a point of debate as the bill moves forward.