New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A4872

Introduced
9/26/24  
Refer
9/26/24  

Caption

Prohibits certain coordination among residential rental property owners who restrict competition with respect to residential dwelling units.

Impact

The bill is intended to amend the New Jersey Antitrust Act and bolster consumer protections by making it unlawful for rental property owners to engage in coordinated pricing strategies. This includes both contractually agreed collaborations and the exchange of information that could lead to price fixing. By targeting the practices utilized through property management software, the legislation could influence the broader housing market, encouraging more competitive pricing and potentially lowering housing costs for renters across New Jersey.

Summary

A4872, introduced in the New Jersey Legislature, aims to prohibit certain forms of coordination among residential rental property owners, particularly practices that could restrict competition related to rental pricing of residential dwelling units. The bill was catalyzed by a significant increase in rental prices, with median rents rising dramatically across the state, contributing to a housing affordability crisis. The bill seeks to address these issues by focusing on the methods used by landlords, particularly the use of property management software that facilitates collusion and pricing agreements among property owners to artificially inflate rental prices.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding A4872 appears to be largely supportive among advocates for tenants and affordable housing, who view it as a critical step toward combating the systemic issues that have contributed to rising rents. However, there could be concerns from property owners regarding the implications for their business operations. Overall, the conversation reflects a commitment to ensuring fair housing practices while balancing the interests of landlords and renters.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the bill's efficacy and practicality. Critics might argue that such regulations could inadvertently lead to an oversaturated market where property owners are unable to set viable rental prices based on market demand. Moreover, there will likely be discussions on the role of technology in the housing market and whether the proposed regulations adequately address the nuances involved with property management software without stifling innovation and operational efficiency.

Companion Bills

NJ S3699

Same As Prohibits facilitation of agreements among rental property owners who restrict competition with respect to residential dwelling units.

Similar Bills

TX HB3709

Relating to the exercise of eminent domain power by certain charitable corporations.

CA AB76

Surplus land: exempt surplus land: sectional planning area.

MD SB606

Residential Real Property - Tenants' Right of First Refusal

MD HB872

Residential Real Property - Tenants' Right of First Refusal

IN SB0014

Vegetable gardens and livestock.

TX SB234

Relating to the operation of property owners' associations.

IA SF161

A bill for an act prohibiting the regulation of certain residential gardens by state agencies and local governments.(See SF 494.)

IA SF494

A bill for an act prohibiting the regulation of certain residential gardens by state agencies and local governments. (Formerly SF 161.)