New Jersey Assembly Bill A5131

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 12/16/24
• Refer: 12/16/24

Caption

Revises law on extended employment programs for persons with disabilities.

Impact

The legislation significantly alters the framework under which extended employment services are delivered in New Jersey, shifting responsibilities from the Commission for the Blind and Visually Impaired to the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation Services. This transition is intended to streamline program administration and clarify the roles and services available to individuals seeking employment support. The bill mandates annual funding levels based on both the New Jersey State Budget and the Consumer Price Index, ensuring that extended employment programs receive adequate financial support consistent with inflation and service demands in the coming fiscal years.

Summary

A5131, also known as the Extended Employment Act, revises existing laws governing extended employment programs in New Jersey. This act aims to enhance the employment opportunities provided to persons with significant disabilities by redefining the criteria and structures of these programs. The bill replaces the previously used term 'sheltered workshop' with 'extended employment,' aiming to modernize the terminology and reflect a more inclusive approach to employment for individuals with disabilities. It seeks to widen eligibility by allowing individuals with significant disabilities to participate without completing a prior workshop program, thereby improving access to supportive services that promote employment readiness and competitive job placement.

Contention

Although A5131 aims to enhance vocational opportunities for individuals with disabilities, it does raise concerns among some stakeholders regarding the potential elimination of key oversight roles and protections previously held by the Commission for the Blind and Visually Impaired. Critics argue that the removal of mandatory progress reporting and reduced documentation could lead to discrepancies in service delivery and monitoring of program effectiveness. Additionally, the changes in eligibility criteria have sparked discussions about the balance between increased access and maintaining quality, tailored support for individuals with differing levels of disability.