New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Assembly Bill A5262 Compare Versions

Only one version of the bill is available at this time.
OldNewDifferences
11 ASSEMBLY, No. 5262 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 221st LEGISLATURE INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 10, 2025
22
33 ASSEMBLY, No. 5262
44
55 STATE OF NEW JERSEY
66
77 221st LEGISLATURE
88
99
1010
1111 INTRODUCED FEBRUARY 10, 2025
1212
1313
1414
1515 Sponsored by: Assemblywoman ELLEN J. PARK District 37 (Bergen) SYNOPSIS Codifies United States Supreme Court ruling that in defamation suit, public official must prove defendant had actual malice: knowledge that defendant's statement was false or reckless disregard of whether it was false. CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT As introduced.
1616
1717
1818
1919 Sponsored by:
2020
2121 Assemblywoman ELLEN J. PARK
2222
2323 District 37 (Bergen)
2424
2525
2626
2727
2828
2929
3030
3131
3232
3333 SYNOPSIS
3434
3535 Codifies United States Supreme Court ruling that in defamation suit, public official must prove defendant had actual malice: knowledge that defendant's statement was false or reckless disregard of whether it was false.
3636
3737
3838
3939 CURRENT VERSION OF TEXT
4040
4141 As introduced.
4242
4343
4444
4545 An Act concerning freedom of speech and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes. Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey: 1. a. In an action for damages by a public official for defamation relating to official conduct by the public official, the public official is barred from recovery unless the public official proves that the allegedly defamatory statement was false and was made with actual malice. b. In any action pursuant to subsection a. of this section, proof of the truthfulness of the allegedly defamatory statement shall be an absolute defense against any recovery by the public official. c. As used in this section: "Actual malice" means that the statement was made by the defendant with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not. "Public official" means a person elected or appointed to a public office. "Elected or appointed to a public office" means the person was appointed by the Governor to a position that requires the advice and consent of the Senate; the person was appointed by the Governor to serve at the pleasure of the Governor during the Governor's term of office; the person was appointed by an elected public official or elected governing body of a political subdivision of the State to a position that requires the specific consent or approval of the elected governing body of the political subdivision; the person was elected to any office filled at an election by the voters at a general election or special election; or the person was appointed or elected to fill a vacancy in an elected office. 2. This act shall take effect immediately. STATEMENT This bill would codify the standard set by the United States Supreme Court concerning civil suits for defamation brought by public officials. In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), the court ruled that in an action for damages by a public official for defamation relating to official conduct by the public official, the public official is barred from recovery unless the public official proves that the allegedly defamatory statement was false and was made with actual malice. This bill embodies that standard. In addition, the bill codifies the longstanding common law principle that proof of the truthfulness of an allegedly defamatory statement is an absolute defense against any recovery by the public official. As noted by the court: "The First Amendment requires that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open, and such debate may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." See Sullivan at 270.
4646
4747 An Act concerning freedom of speech and supplementing Title 2A of the New Jersey Statutes.
4848
4949
5050
5151 Be It Enacted by the Senate and General Assembly of the State of New Jersey:
5252
5353
5454
5555 1. a. In an action for damages by a public official for defamation relating to official conduct by the public official, the public official is barred from recovery unless the public official proves that the allegedly defamatory statement was false and was made with actual malice.
5656
5757 b. In any action pursuant to subsection a. of this section, proof of the truthfulness of the allegedly defamatory statement shall be an absolute defense against any recovery by the public official.
5858
5959 c. As used in this section:
6060
6161 "Actual malice" means that the statement was made by the defendant with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not.
6262
6363 "Public official" means a person elected or appointed to a public office.
6464
6565 "Elected or appointed to a public office" means the person was appointed by the Governor to a position that requires the advice and consent of the Senate; the person was appointed by the Governor to serve at the pleasure of the Governor during the Governor's term of office; the person was appointed by an elected public official or elected governing body of a political subdivision of the State to a position that requires the specific consent or approval of the elected governing body of the political subdivision; the person was elected to any office filled at an election by the voters at a general election or special election; or the person was appointed or elected to fill a vacancy in an elected office.
6666
6767
6868
6969 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
7070
7171
7272
7373
7474
7575 STATEMENT
7676
7777
7878
7979 This bill would codify the standard set by the United States Supreme Court concerning civil suits for defamation brought by public officials. In New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964), the court ruled that in an action for damages by a public official for defamation relating to official conduct by the public official, the public official is barred from recovery unless the public official proves that the allegedly defamatory statement was false and was made with actual malice. This bill embodies that standard.
8080
8181 In addition, the bill codifies the longstanding common law principle that proof of the truthfulness of an allegedly defamatory statement is an absolute defense against any recovery by the public official.
8282
8383 As noted by the court: "The First Amendment requires that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide open, and such debate may well include vehement, caustic, and sometimes unpleasantly sharp attacks on government and public officials." See Sullivan at 270.