New Jersey Assembly Bill A5381

New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/6/25
• Refer: 3/6/25
• Refer: 4/10/25

Caption

Provides for filing extension and medical documentation requirement for certain members of PERS, PFRS, and SPRS to receive accidental disability retirement allowance for participation in 9/11 World Trade Center rescue, recovery, or cleanup operations.

Impact

This legislation expands the ability of members and retirees to access accidental disability retirement allowances, reflecting a more inclusive approach towards health-related issues arising from the 9/11 rescue efforts. It addresses a gap for individuals who may not have been able to file their claims within the original timeframe and acknowledges the ongoing health complications that can result from situations faced during the recovery efforts. Thus, A5381 would significantly benefit those affected by 9/11 by allowing greater opportunities to demonstrate their eligibility for disability retirement based on their service-related health issues.

Summary

Assembly Bill A5381 aims to amend the eligibility criteria for members of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS), the Police and Firemen's Retirement System (PFRS), and the State Police Retirement System (SPRS) seeking accidental disability retirement allowances due to participation in 9/11 World Trade Center rescue, recovery, or cleanup operations. The bill proposes an extension of the filing period for members and retirees to submit their applications for these benefits, allowing them option up to two years after the act’s effective date, compared to the previous two-year limit from an earlier law passed in 2019. Additionally, it grants the board of trustees the authority to approve further extensions in two-year increments as needed.

Contention

One notable aspect of A5381 is its proposed adjustment in the requirements for medical documentation needed to prove eligibility for these benefits. The bill allows individuals to submit evidence from previous medical examinations that did not disclose specific health impairments at the time of their service, thus potentially reducing the burden on affected individuals when proving their disabilities. However, this amendment may meet resistance from lawmakers who prioritize strict eligibility criteria to curb potential abuse of the system. The balancing act between providing support for 9/11 responders and maintaining the integrity of the retirement benefits framework is likely to yield discussions about the adequacy and fairness of these provisions.