New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Senate Bill S1336

Introduced
1/9/24  

Caption

Establishes certain requirements for social media websites concerning content moderation practices; establishes cause of action against social media websites for violation of content moderation practices.

Impact

If enacted, this legislation could significantly alter the operational landscape for social media platforms in New Jersey. By stipulating that users must be notified prior to any censorship action, the bill enhances user rights and could limit the discretion currently exercised by these platforms. It also establishes penalties for non-compliance, which could include substantial fines for social media firms. The requirement for platforms to offer opportunities for users to opt-out of specific content management practices could also empower users, promoting greater transparency in how online content is managed.

Summary

Senate Bill S1336 seeks to establish requirements for social media websites regarding their content moderation practices and creates a cause for legal action against these platforms. Specifically, the bill mandates that social media companies remain transparent about the standards used to moderate content, including when they censor or ban users. This reflects growing concerns over how social media impacts free speech and user rights, particularly in political contexts. The bill requires social media platforms to provide clear mechanisms for users to understand the rationale behind their content being censored or prioritized.

Contention

One notable area of contention surrounding S1336 revolves around the balance between public safety and free expression. Critics may argue that the increased regulatory burden on social media websites could hinder their ability to regulate harmful content effectively. Conversely, supporters contend that the bill is a necessary measure to protect users from arbitrary censorship and to ensure that all voices, especially those of political candidates and journalistic enterprises, are treated equally on these platforms. The discussion reflects broader societal debates about the role of social media in shaping public discourse and the need for accountability in digital spaces.

Companion Bills

NJ A3844

Same As Establishes certain requirements for social media websites concerning content moderation practices; establishes cause of action against social media websites for violation of content moderation practices.

NJ S595

Carry Over Establishes certain requirements for social media websites concerning content moderation practices; establishes cause of action against social media websites for violation of content moderation practices.

Similar Bills

NJ A3844

Establishes certain requirements for social media websites concerning content moderation practices; establishes cause of action against social media websites for violation of content moderation practices.

NJ S595

Establishes certain requirements for social media websites concerning content moderation practices; establishes cause of action against social media websites for violation of content moderation practices.

NJ A4738

Establishes requirements for social media companies concerning content moderation practices; establishes cause of action against social media companies for violation of content moderation practices.

AZ SB1106

Social media platforms; standards; notification

AZ SB1344

Social media platforms; standards; notification

TX HB3105

Relating to unlawful acts and practices of social media platforms; providing a civil penalty.

OK HB2548

Social media; Oklahoma Social Media Transparency Act of 2023; industry requirements; shadow banning; algorithms; effective date.

OK HB2548

Social media; Oklahoma Social Media Transparency Act of 2023; industry requirements; shadow banning; algorithms; effective date.