Makes various changes to civil service; permits institution of temporary layoffs; permits government entities to opt-out of civil service; requires civil service examinations be offered on continual basis.
The bill also includes a provision allowing counties, municipalities, and school districts to opt out of civil service regulations. This would mean that local governmental units could potentially undo their civil service status through a petition signed by 15% of registered voters, with this question then brought to a general or municipal election. Critics argue that this could undermine employee protections at a local level, making it easier for local governments to make hiring and firing decisions without the oversight of civil service laws. Supporters contend this flexibility is necessary for local governments to respond effectively to changing workforce needs.
Senate Bill S1351 proposes a series of amendments to the civil service laws in New Jersey, specifically aiming to provide greater flexibility for public employers. One of the prominent features of the bill is the allowance for temporary layoffs that public employers can initiate for reasons such as economy or efficiency. This provision requires consultation with the majority representative of public employees, but it makes clear that failure to reach an agreement does not prevent the employer from proceeding with layoffs. This aspect of the bill has sparked significant discussion regarding worker rights and protections during economic downturns.
Notable contention arises around the provisions that govern the opt-out process from civil service. Critics express concern that allowing local governments to rescind civil service protections could lead to a 'race to the bottom' in employee treatment, as jurisdictions may prioritize cost savings over worker rights. Additionally, the bill proposes that any public entity that rescinds civil service cannot readopt these protections for at least ten years, limiting the ability of workers to regain protections in the future. As such, the legislation has become a pivotal point of debate regarding the balance of power between state governance and local control.