Replaces references to "alien" and "illegal alien" in statutes with "noncitizen" and "undocumented noncitizen," respectively; prohibits use of those terms by executive branch agencies.
The impact of S2736 on state law is significant, as it alters various statutes where the previous terms were utilized. For example, in areas related to inheritance and property rights, the bill will ensure that noncitizens are afforded the same legal considerations as citizens concerning their rights in estate matters. The legislative intent behind this bill is not just cosmetic; it aims to underscore the recognition of noncitizens' contributions to society, thereby promoting a culture of inclusiveness in law. Additionally, it seeks to prevent further marginalization of immigrant communities which may occur through the usage of prescriptive terminology.
Senate Bill 2736 aims to reform the terminology used in New Jersey statutes regarding individuals who are not citizens of the United States. Specifically, it removes references to 'alien' and 'illegal alien,' replacing them with 'noncitizen' and 'undocumented noncitizen.' This change reflects a broader trend towards more inclusive and respectful language in legal discourse, seeking to eliminate the stigmatization that comes with outdated terminology. The bill mandates that all executive branch agencies in the state adhere to this new language in any proposed or final rules, regulations, publications, or official documents, thereby changing the way resident noncitizens are addressed legally and administratively within the state.
While the language adjustment in S2736 is largely framed as a matter of respect and updated societal values, it does not come without contention. Critics may argue that such changes could dilute the enforcement of immigration laws or complicate the distinction between legal and illegal residency statuses in certain legal contexts. Additionally, some lawmakers might perceive this as part of a broader agenda to broaden rights and access for noncitizens. Proponents of traditional language may express concern that revising statutory language alters the intended frameworks for immigration law and order. Thus, debates surrounding the bill could see opposition rooted in different philosophical approaches to immigration and citizenship.