New Jersey 2024-2025 Regular Session

New Jersey Senate Bill S2930

Introduced
3/4/24  
Refer
3/4/24  
Report Pass
3/11/24  
Report Pass
5/9/24  
Engrossed
5/13/24  
Enrolled
5/13/24  
Chaptered
6/5/24  

Caption

Makes various changes to process for access to government records; appropriates $10 million.

Impact

The proposed changes represent a substantial shift in how New Jersey manages and disseminates government records. By appropriating funds towards the digitization and electronic accessibility of these records, the bill is expected to break down barriers to public information access. Furthermore, it amends provisions in existing laws governing the release of government documents, aiming to clarify and simplify the redaction processes while maintaining essential privacy protections. This development is anticipated to significantly enhance public engagement and trust in state government operations.

Summary

S2930 is a bill focused on modifying the processes pertaining to access to government records in New Jersey. The legislation aims to expand and improve the electronic accessibility of public records, with a significant financial appropriation of $10 million allocated among various governmental bodies to support these initiatives. This enhancement is intended to facilitate better transparency to the public and streamline the request process for obtaining records, thereby enriching governmental accountability and service delivery to citizens.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding S2930 appears to be largely positive among its supporters, who view the bill as a necessary advancement towards greater transparency and efficiency within governmental operations. Various interest groups and community advocates have expressed approval, highlighting the bill as a step forward for citizen engagement in local governance. However, there are concerns from some parties regarding the adequacy of protections for sensitive information and how these changes will be implemented in practice.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the adequacy of the financial investment relative to the scope of the changes being implemented, as well as debates on the balance between transparency and privacy. Some legislators and advocacy groups have raised questions about potential misuse of sensitive data and the implications of digitizing records that may contain private information. The bill's implementation will require ongoing scrutiny to ensure that it meets its objectives without compromising essential safeguards.

Companion Bills

NJ A4045

Same As Makes various changes to process for access to government records; appropriates $10 million.

Similar Bills

NJ A3530

Exempts personal identifying information of minor from disclosure in public record; requires information to be redacted.

NJ A4285

Expands "Daniel's Law" to prohibit disclosure of personal information concerning court administrators and deputy court administrators.

NJ A1626

Permits government records custodians to redact certain personal information.

TX SB1646

Relating to the public information law.

TX HB3848

Relating to the public information law; creating a criminal offense.

LA HB49

Provides relative to the confidentiality of records from certain hearings of the Board of Pardons and committee on parole (OR SEE FISC NOTE LF EX)

AZ HB2927

Public meetings; records; requirements; penalties

GA HB268

Education; safety, health, and well-being of students and school communities; provide